6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kenneth Bell v. Durant Brockett.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kenneth Bell v. Durant Brockett Anchor | green | “appellants may not raise arguments on appeal that were not first presented below to the district court.” | 8 |
| 2 | Field v. Clark | green | “reciprocally unequal and unreasonable” | 5 |
| 3 | Shalala v. Whitecotton | green | “a claimant . . . must exhaust the act's procedures and refuse to accept the resulting judgment before filing any de novo civil action.” | 3 |
| 4 | Shalala v. Whitecotton | green | “a claimant may still establish prima facie entitlement to compensation by introducing proof of actual causation.” | 3 |
| 5 | Schafer v. American Cyanamid Co. | green | “the act requires that a person injured directly by a vaccine first bring a vaccine act proceeding.” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re Chevron U.S.A., Inc. | green | “some members of a large group of claimants” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.