2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dolan v. City of Tigard.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dolan v. City of Tigard Anchor | green | “no precise mathematical calculation is required, but the city must make some sort of individualized determination that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development.” | 16 |
| 2 | Nollan v. California Coastal Commission | green | “an out-and-out plan of extortion.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.