6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lightlab Imaging, Inc. v. Axsun Technologies, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lightlab Imaging, Inc. v. Axsun Technologies, Inc. Anchor | green | “trial judges have broad discretion to grant or deny injunctive relief.” | 7 |
| 2 | Student No. 9 v. Board of Education | green | “the significant remedy of a preliminary injunction should not be granted unless the plaintiffs had made a clear showing of entitlement thereto.” | 5 |
| 3 | EEOC v. ASTRA U.S.A., Inc. | green | “simply stated, more of one excuses less of the other.” | 4 |
| 4 | Litton Industries, Inc. v. Rafael Hernandez Colon | green | “an injunction is a remedy and not a cause of action; therefore, it must be based on some recognized and pleaded legal theory” | 3 |
| 5 | Wilson v. Commissioner of Transitional Assistance | green | “to obtain a preliminary injunction, the applicant must show a likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying claim; actual or threatened irreparable harm in the absence of injunction; and a lesser degree of irreparable harm to the opposing party from the imposition of an …” | 3 |
| 6 | Psy-Ed Corp. v. Klein | green | “is a form of sworn testimony the credibility of which is to be determined by the judge.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.