4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Latalladi v. People.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Latalladi v. People Anchor | green | “when appellants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial, it is well established that, in a review following conviction, all issues of credibility within the province of the jury must be viewed in the light most favorable to the government.” | 10 |
| 2 | United States v. Allard | green | “does not need to be inconsistent with every conclusion save that of guilt” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Lorenzo Gonzalez, A/K/A \Tito | green | “this evidence 'does not need to be inconsistent with every conclusion save that of guilt' in order to sustain the verdict.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Allard | green | “an appellant who seeks to overturn a conviction on insufficiency of the evidence grounds bears 'a very heavy burden.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.