6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from A CAB, LLC v. MURRAY.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A CAB, LLC v. MURRAY Anchor | green | “a district court's decision to grant summary judgment is reviewed de novo.” | 5 |
| 2 | Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Mason City, Iowa v. National Labor Relations Board | green | “technical rules of contract formation do not control whether a cba has been reached.” | 4 |
| 3 | Clark v. Robison | green | “a cause of action accrues when a suit may be maintained thereon.” | 4 |
| 4 | Landesman v. General Motors Corp. | green | “that the named representatives of the putative class possess a valid cause of action.” | 4 |
| 5 | EGGLESTON VS. STUART | green | “a dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to nrcp 12(b)(5) is reviewed de novo.” | 4 |
| 6 | A CAB, LLC v. MURRAY | green | “summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and all other evidence on file demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.