7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Florida National Guard and Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations Authority.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida National Guard and Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations Authority Anchor | green | “congress is deemed to know the executive and judicial gloss given to certain language and thus adopts the existing interpretation unless it affirmatively acts to change the meaning.” | 8 |
| 2 | Wagner v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY | green | “title i addresses primarily the rights of disabled individuals in workplaces, while title ii addresses the rights of disabled citizens vis-a-vis the government.” | 3 |
| 3 | Wagner v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY | green | “separate and distinct enforceable rights.” | 3 |
| 4 | Bledsoe v. Palm Beach Soil & Water Conservation District | green | “understood as a whole, focus on a public entity's outputs rather than its imputs .” | 3 |
| 5 | Bledsoe v. Palm Beach Soil & Water Conservation District | green | “services, programs, or activities.” | 3 |
| 6 | Hernandez v. City of Hartford | green | “not fill the gaps in the ada in an attempt to effectuate a purported congressional intent that is not entirely evident.” | 3 |
| 7 | Bledsoe v. Palm Beach Soil & Water Conservation District | green | “acceptance of the 'no exhaustion rule,' when coupled with the slighting of title ii's plain meaning and the redundancy of titles i and ii, renders the entire statutory framework a monstrous distortion.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.