3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Lattimer-Stevens Company v. The United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, District 27, Sub-District 5.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Lattimer-Stevens Company v. The United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, District 27, Sub-District 5 Anchor | green | “one of the narrowest standards of judicial review in all of american jurisprudence.” | 19 |
| 2 | Eberhard Foods, Inc. v. Jerome Handy and Local 406, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen and Helpers of America | green | “the language of the contract at hand is sufficiently clear so as to deny the arbitrator the authority to interpret the agreement as he did.” | 3 |
| 3 | The Lattimer-Stevens Company v. The United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, District 27, Sub-District 5 | green | “when courts are called on to review an arbitrator's decision, the review is very narrow; one of the narrowest standards of judicial review in all of american jurisprudence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.