3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Raniola v. Bratton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raniola v. Bratton Anchor | green | “once a prima facie case of retaliation is established, the burden of production shifts to the employer to demonstrate that a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason existed for its action.” | 16 |
| 2 | Raniola v. Bratton | green | “the burden shifts ... back to the plaintiff to establish, through either direct or circumstantial evidence, that the employer's action was, in fact, motivated by discriminatory retaliation.” | 5 |
| 3 | Consolidated Gold Fields Plc v. Minorco | green | “the incidents must be repeated and continuous; isolated acts or occasional episodes will not merit relief.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.