3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hodge v. Federal Bureau of Investigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hodge v. Federal Bureau of Investigation Anchor | green | “he adequacy of a search is determined not by the fruits of the search, but by the appropriateness of methods.” | 8 |
| 2 | Mobley v. Central Intelligence Agency | green | “search, under foia, is not unreasonable simply because it fails to produce all relevant material.” | 8 |
| 3 | Hodge v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | green | “the adequacy of a search is determined not by the fruits of the search, but by the appropriateness of methods” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.