3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Procter & Gamble Company v. Bankers Trust Company, Bt Securities Corporation, the McGraw Companies, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Procter & Gamble Company v. Bankers Trust Company, Bt Securities Corporation, the McGraw Companies, Inc. Anchor | green | “to preserve the status quo so that a reasoned resolution of a dispute may be had.” | 11 |
| 2 | The Procter & Gamble Company v. Bankers Trust Company, Bt Securities Corporation, the McGraw Companies, Inc. | green | “the purpose of a tro under rule 65 is to preserve the status quo so that a reasoned resolution of a dispute may be had.” | 9 |
| 3 | Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless & Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 v. Blackwell | green | “these factors are not prerequisites which must be met, but are interrelated considerations that must be balanced together.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.