3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Donnita Carmichael v. City of Cleveland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Donnita Carmichael v. City of Cleveland Anchor | green | “dismissals for lack of jurisdiction based on eleventh amendment immunity should be made without prejudice.” | 13 |
| 2 | Ernst v. Rising | green | “flow from the nature of sovereignty itself as well as the tenth and eleventh amendments.” | 8 |
| 3 | Puckett v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government | green | “the ex parte young doctrine applies only when the lawsuit involves an action against state officials, not against the state itself.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.