5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque Anchor | green | “stare decisis is the judicial obligation to follow precedent, and it lies at the very core of the judicial process of interpreting and announcing law.” | 10 |
| 2 | Madrid v. Village of Chama | green | “dismissal under rule 1-012(b)(6) is appropriate only if the non-moving party is not entitled to recover under any theory of the facts alleged in their complaint.” | 5 |
| 3 | Jordan v. Allstate Insurance | green | “inform the insured about premium costs corresponding to the available levels of coverage.” | 4 |
| 4 | Madrid v. Village of Chama | green | “only that the plaintiff allege facts sufficient to put the defendant on notice of his claims.” | 3 |
| 5 | Madrid v. Village of Chama | green | “the purpose of our rule is to test the law of the claim, not the facts that support it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.