2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick Craig.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick Craig Anchor | green | “appellate review is generally limited to the issues that have been presented for review.” | 22 |
| 2 | Thomas Fleming Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of Tennessee | green | “questions regarding the admissibility, relevancy, and competency of expert testimony are left to the discretion of the trial court, and the trial court's ruling may only be overturned if that discretion is abused or arbitrarily exercised.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.