2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard Douglas Thomas, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Douglas Thomas, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Anchor | green | “an abuse of discretion occurs only when 'reasonable jurists' could not disagree as to the proper decision.” | 21 |
| 2 | Andrew Vojuan Burrous v. Commonwealth of Virginia | green | “drawing reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.