2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Klein v. Klein.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Klein v. Klein Anchor | green | “in reviewing an equitable distribution award on appeal, we have recognized that the trial court's job is a difficult one, and we rely heavily on the discretion of the trial judge in weighing the many considerations and circumstances that are presented in each case.” | 19 |
| 2 | Sara Rahbaran v. Kamran Rahbaran | green | “a decision regarding equitable distribution . . . will not be reversed unless it is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.