5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nextera Energy Resources LLC v. Iowa Utilities Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nextera Energy Resources LLC v. Iowa Utilities Board Anchor | green | “even in cases where a party has not suggested that our approach under the iowa constitution should be different from that under the federal constitution, we reserve the right to apply the standard in a fashion at variance with federal cases under the iowa constitution.” | 5 |
| 2 | State of Iowa v. Randall Lee Pals | green | “even where a party has not advanced a different standard for interpreting a state constitutional provision, we may apply the standard more stringently than federal case law.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re SAJB | green | “in analyzing claims under the iowa equal protection clause, we independently apply federal principles.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Bruegger | green | “e do not necessarily apply the federal standards in the same way as the united states supreme court.” | 3 |
| 5 | State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Becker | green | “even where a party has not provided a substantive standard independent of federal law, we reserve the right to apply the standard presented by the party in a fashion different than the federal cases.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.