7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from French v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | French v. State Anchor | green | “dismiss a count under nrs 207.010 when the prior offenses are stale or trivial, or in other circumstances where an adjudication of habitual criminality would not serve the purposes of the statute or the interests of justice.” | 4 |
| 2 | Bias v. State | green | “that this show-up procedure was unnecessarily suggestive because there were no countervailing policy considerations to justify it.” | 4 |
| 3 | Bias v. State | green | “degree of attention was undoubtedly high” | 4 |
| 4 | Arajakis v. State | green | “makes no special allowance for non-violent crimes or for the remoteness of convictions” | 4 |
| 5 | French v. State | green | “when the prior offenses are stale or trivial, or in other circumstances where an adjudication of habitual criminality would not serve the purposes of the statute or the interests of justice.” | 3 |
| 6 | Arajakis v. State | green | “nrs 207.010 makes no special allowance for non-violent crimes or for the remoteness of convictions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.