3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re KW.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re KW Anchor | green | “if multiple predicate grounds are found by the trial court, we will affirm based on any one ground because only one is necessary for termination of parental rights.” | 12 |
| 2 | In Re RAL | green | “be so rigorous that the only fact-findings that could withstand review are those established beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 7 |
| 3 | Perez v. TEX. DEPT. OF PRO. & REG. SERVICES | green | “must be based on more than a single act or omission; a voluntary, deliberate, and conscious course of conduct by the parent is required.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.