6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Texas State Board of Pharmacy v. Walgreen Texas Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas State Board of Pharmacy v. Walgreen Texas Co. Anchor | green | “administrative agencies have no power to determine the constitutionality of statutes.” | 5 |
| 2 | Juliff Gardens v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | green | “there is no sound reason for forcing a litigant through the administrative process when in good faith he is advancing a substantial complaint that the statute that he is charged with violating is unconstitutional.” | 4 |
| 3 | Texas Department of Insurance v. Reconveyance Services, Inc. | green | “in many cases, the standing and ripeness inquiries merge” | 4 |
| 4 | Texas Court Reporters Certification Board v. Esquire Deposition Services, L.L.C. | green | “each is a threshold question that implicates subject matter jurisdiction and each emphasizes the necessity of a concrete injury for a justiciable claim to be presented.” | 4 |
| 5 | Beacon National Insurance Co. v. Montemayor | green | “concern that the agency will institute an administrative enforcement action against it.” | 4 |
| 6 | Texas State Board of Pharmacy v. Walgreen Texas Co. | green | “there is no sound reason for forcing a litigant through the administrative process when in good faith he is advancing a substantial complaint that the statute that he is charged with violating is unconstitutional.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.