7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Oakland Raiders v. National Football League.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakland Raiders v. National Football League Anchor | green | “the pleadings set the boundaries of the issues to be resolved at summary judgment” | 5 |
| 2 | Lingsch v. Savage | green | “there are 'four circumstances in which nondisclosure or concealment may constitute actionable fraud: (1) when the defendant is in a fiduciary relationship with the plaintiff; (2) when the defendant had exclusive knowledge of material facts not known to the plaintiff; (3) when th…” | 4 |
| 3 | Pavicich v. Santucci | green | “the principle that 'where one does speak he must speak the whole truth to the end that he does not conceal any facts which materially qualify those stated. one who is asked for or volunteers information must be truthful, and the telling of a half-truth calculated to deceive is f…” | 4 |
| 4 | Archdale v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance | green | “self-serving declarations that contradict credible discovery admissions and purport to impeach that party's own prior sworn testimony” | 3 |
| 5 | Thrifty-Tel, Inc. v. Bezenek | green | “the suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true.” | 3 |
| 6 | Conrad v. Bank of America | green | “agreed to process the loan application and said he would comply” | 3 |
| 7 | Vega v. Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue | green | “the transaction was 'standard' and 'nothing unusual,' . . . jones day provided a different, sanitized version of the disclosure to monsterbook.com's attorneys.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.