6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. Jorling.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. Jorling Anchor | green | “new language cannot be imported into a statute to give it a meaning not otherwise found therein” | 10 |
| 2 | Raritan Development Corp. v. Silva | green | “is contrary to the plain meaning of the statutory language” | 3 |
| 3 | Lantry v. State | green | “labor law 220 implements the constitutional mandate that contractors engaged in public projects pay their workers wages and supplements which 'shall not be less than the prevailing rate for a day's work in the same trade or occupation in the locality within the state where such…” | 3 |
| 4 | Albano v. Kirby | green | “the legislature uses unlike terms in different parts of a statute it is reasonable to infer that a dissimilar meaning is intended” | 3 |
| 5 | Nash v. New York State Department of Labor | green | “the classification of work . . . actually performed” | 3 |
| 6 | Chanos v. Madac, LLC | green | “a glazier apprentice . . . who performs work classified as ironworker's work must be paid an ironworker's journeyman prevailing rate” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.