5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States Ex Rel. Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Ex Rel. Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. Anchor | green | “the first congress authorized qui tam suits in at least 10 of the first 14 statutes imposing penalties.” | 5 |
| 2 | Herr v. United States Forest Service | green | “express agreement ..., showing that the injured parties manifested an intent to assign their right to sue.” | 5 |
| 3 | Gustav Buchholz v. Meyer Njus Tanick, PA | green | “laid on the examining table and scrutinized for its conformity to' the concrete-injury element more recently devised by the court?” | 5 |
| 4 | Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart Associates | green | “are entitled to special solicitude in an article iii standing analysis” | 5 |
| 5 | Riley v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital | green | “given the limitations on both the issues presented and the holding in marvin, that case cannot be cited with any credibility as a considered holding on the issue of standing under the false claims act.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.