3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc. Anchor | green | “substantial and competent evidence is relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion.” | 18 |
| 2 | Steen v. Denny's Restaurant | green | “on appeal from the industrial commission, this court exercises free review of the commission's legal conclusions, but will not disturb findings of fact if they are supported by substantial and competent evidence.” | 4 |
| 3 | Excell Construction, Inc. v. State | green | “the conclusions reached by the industrial commission regarding the credibility and weight of evidence will not be disturbed unless the conclusions are clearly erroneous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.