4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Kendrick Crawford.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Kendrick Crawford Anchor | green | “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 9 |
| 2 | United States v. Charles Williamson | green | “we review the district court's calculation of the quantity of drugs attributable to a defendant for sentencing purposes for clear error.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Kendrick Crawford | green | “we review the district court's calculation of the quantity of drugs attributable to a defendant for sentencing purposes for clear error.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Kendrick Crawford | green | “we will reverse the district court's finding only if we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.