7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Stacy Harden, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Stacy Harden, Jr. Anchor | green | “conduct a long, searching colloquy” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Renard R. Butler | green | “no reasonable person could know what conduct is permitted and what is prohibited,” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Solomon Smith, Jr. | green | “affirmatively told the district court that he had no objection” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Schrode | green | “district court expressly invited objections to the proposed visitation condition, and smith's attorney, with the benefit of having seen the condition in advance, responded that the condition was 'reasonable.” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. John Bloch, III | green | “decision to single out and ob ject to only one condition is the very 'touchstone of waiver,' as it indicates 'a knowing and intentional decision.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Lewis | green | “the foundation for these limits on ap pellate review is that a district judge needs to ensure that parties have a fair and genuine opportunity to raise objec tions in the district court.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Young | green | “an ap pellate court need not consider a claimed error if the issue has been waived.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.