8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rivera v. City of New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rivera v. City of New York Anchor | green | “request for the imposition of a penalty pursuant to cplr 3126 is improperly made for the first time on appeal” | 4 |
| 2 | Anderson v. Roncone | green | “an order of visitation cannot be modified unless there has been a sufficient change in circumstances since the entry of the prior order that, if not addressed, would have an adverse effect on the child's best interests” | 3 |
| 3 | Collins v. Telcoa International Corp. | green | “seeks an adjudication of civil contempt based upon a violation of a court order, he or she must establish a willful and deliberate violation of a lawful court order expressing a clear and unequivocal mandate” | 3 |
| 4 | Dingeldey v. Dingeldey | green | “a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant an inquiry into whether the best interests of the child warranted a change in custody” | 3 |
| 5 | Dingeldey v. Dingeldey | green | “an inquiry into whether the best interests of the child warranted a change in custody” | 3 |
| 6 | Ruple v. Harkenreader | green | “need not always include contact visitation at the prison” | 3 |
| 7 | Thomas v. Thomas | green | “is incarcerated will not, by itself, render visitation with him inappropriate” | 3 |
| 8 | Thomas v. Thomas | green | “unless there is a compelling reason or substantial evidence that visitation with an incarcerated parent is detrimental to a child's welfare, such visitation should not be” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.