3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Panetti v. Quarterman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panetti v. Quarterman Anchor | green | “when a state court's adjudication of a claim is dependent on an antecedent unreasonable application of federal law, the requirement set forth in 2254(d)(1) is satisfied. a federal court must then resolve the claim without the deference aedpa otherwise requires.” | 13 |
| 2 | McGahee v. Alabama Department of Corrections | green | “where we have determined that a state court decision is an unreasonable application of federal law under 28 u.s.c. 2254 (d), we are unconstrained by 2254's deference and must undertake a de novo review of the record.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Lowden David | green | “the striking of one black juror for a racial reason violates the equal protection clause, even where other black jurors are seated, and even when valid reasons for the striking of some black jurors are shown.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.