7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Revilla v. Gibson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revilla v. Gibson Anchor | green | “so grossly prejudicial that it fatally infected the trial and denied the fundamental fairness that is the essence of due process.” | 6 |
| 2 | Romano v. Gibson | green | “on direct appeal, petitioners did challenge the trial court's exclusion of this evidence on federal constitutional grounds, but the occa addressed these claims only under state law” | 3 |
| 3 | Romano v. Gibson | green | “we need ask no more than whether the trial court's application of this state evidentiary rule excluded critical exculpatory evidence.” | 3 |
| 4 | Revilla v. Gibson | green | “only if the alleged error was so grossly prejudicial that it fatally infected the trial and denied the fundamental fairness that is the essence of due process.” | 3 |
| 5 | Ellis v. State | green | “any probative value of dr. garcia's report was substantially outweighed by the danger of misleading the jury and confusing the issues of competency and sanity.” | 3 |
| 6 | Ellis v. State | green | “felt his body was frozen by the demons and spirits trying to take over his body.” | 3 |
| 7 | Ellis v. State | green | “substantially outweighed by the danger of misleading the jury and confusing the issues of competency and sanity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.