3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. Martinez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. Martinez Anchor | green | “section 23-110(g)'s plain language makes clear that it only divests federal courts of jurisdiction to hear habeas petitions by prisoners who could have raised viable claims pursuant to section 23-110(a).” | 14 |
| 2 | Williams v. Martinez | green | “because the superior court lacks authority to entertain a section 23-110 motion challenging the effectiveness of appellate counsel.” | 7 |
| 3 | Wilson v. Office of the Chairperson, District of Columbia Board of Parole | green | “a petitioner may not complain that the remedies provided him by d.c. code 23-110 are inadequate merely because he was unsuccessful when he invoked them.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.