4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ingram v. Brinks Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ingram v. Brinks Incorporated Anchor | green | “once the moving party avers the absence of genuine issues of material fact, the nonmovant must show that a factual dispute does exist, but summary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.” | 11 |
| 2 | Ingram v. Brinks Incorporated | green | “summary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.” | 6 |
| 3 | Ophthalmic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Paychex, Inc. | green | “granting summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party 'shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 4 | Enica v. Principi | green | “in the summary judgment context, 'genuine' has been construed to mean 'that the evidence about the fact is such that a reasonable jury could resolve the point in favor of the nonmoving party.' similarly, a fact is 'material' if it is 'one that might affect the outcome of the sui…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.