3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Killingsworth v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Killingsworth v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. Anchor | green | “claim is sufficiently plausible to survive a motion to dismiss is 'a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.” | 18 |
| 2 | Matthew M. Benning v. Board Of Regents Of Regency Universities | green | “the eleventh amendment forbids a federal court from ordering state officials to conform their conduct to state law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ulysses Scott v. L. Altamirano | green | “all of the defendants in this suit, however, are public employees (plus their employer), which means that a conspiracy claim has no role to play.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.