5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Oyeniran v. Eric H. Holder Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oyeniran v. Eric H. Holder Jr. Anchor | green | “(1) the issue at stake was identical in both proceedings; (2) the issue was actually litigated and decided in the prior proceedings; (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue; and (4) the issue was necessary to decide the merits.” | 13 |
| 2 | Oyeniran v. Eric H. Holder Jr. | green | “collateral estoppel applies to a question, issue, or fact when four conditions are met: (1) the issue at stake was identical in both proceedings; (2) the issue was actually litigated and decided in the prior proceedings; (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate the …” | 3 |
| 3 | Janell Howard v. City of Coos Bay | green | “(1) the issue at stake was identical in both proceedings; (2) the issue was actually litigated and decided in the prior proceedings; (3) there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue; and (4) the issue was necessary to decide the merits.” | 3 |
| 4 | Ntch-Wa, Inc. v. Zte Corp. | green | “including the same preclusive effect.” | 3 |
| 5 | Ntch-Wa, Inc. v. Zte Corp. | green | “federal-court order confirming an arbitration award has 'the same force and effect' as a final judgment on the merits, 9 u.s.c. 13 , including the same preclusive effect.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.