5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Medical Mut. of Ohio v. K. AMALIA ENTERPRISES INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Medical Mut. of Ohio v. K. AMALIA ENTERPRISES INC. Anchor | green | “summary judgment is proper if the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 9 |
| 2 | Menninger v. Accredited Home Lenders (In Re Morgeson) | green | “under a de novo standard of review, the reviewing court decides the issue independently of, and without deference to, the trial court's determination.” | 5 |
| 3 | Bonner v. Perry | green | “that does not dispose of all parties and all claims is generally not immediately appealable.” | 4 |
| 4 | In Re Jack Wayne Bursack, Debtor. Rally Hill Productions, Inc. v. Jack Wayne Bursack | green | “under tennessee law, collateral estoppel bars relitigation of an issue if it was raised in an earlier case between the same parties, actually litigated, and necessary to the judgment of the earlier case.” | 3 |
| 5 | Spring Works, Inc. v. Sarff (In Re Sarff) | green | “the determination of the applicability of collateral estoppel is also reviewed de novo.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.