3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Anchor | green | “an rfc that fails to take into account a claimant's limitations is defective” | 10 |
| 2 | Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | green | “n rfc that fails to take into account a claimant's limitations is defective.” | 5 |
| 3 | Karen Lambert v. Andrew Saul | green | “our cases do not require aljs to perform a line-by-line exegesis of the claimant's testimony. . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.