6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Greenberg Peden, P.C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Greenberg Peden, P.C. Anchor | green | “because a lawyer's fiduciary duty to a client covers contract negotiations between them, such contracts are closely scrutinized.” | 5 |
| 2 | Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody | green | “it is not the role of the expert witness to define the particular legal principles applicable to a case; that is the role of the trial court.” | 5 |
| 3 | Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Greenberg Peden, P.C. | green | “and so that this responsibility is not a mere and meaningless formality, the lawyer must be clear.” | 4 |
| 4 | Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody | green | “apply legal terms to his understanding of the factual matters in issue” | 4 |
| 5 | Authorlee v. Tuboscope Vetco International, Inc. | green | “an aggregate settlement occurs when an attorney, who represents two or more clients, settles the entire case on behalf of those clients without individual negotiations on behalf of any one client.” | 3 |
| 6 | Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody | green | “an expert may state an opinion on a mixed question of law and fact if the opinion is limited to the relevant issues and is based on proper legal concepts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.