3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Khalil Abu Rayyan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Khalil Abu Rayyan Anchor | green | “placed too much weight on some of the 3553(a) factors and too little on others.” | 12 |
| 2 | United States v. Keller | green | “reasonableness review has both substantive and procedural components.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Angel | green | “we review the district court's factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.