Topic: no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or thr… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1671

8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 166 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. Anchor
scotus · 1938
green “no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted.” 71
2 Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.
scotus · 1938
green “long settled rule of judicial administration that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted.” 43
3 Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.
scotus · 1938
green “that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted.” 24
4 Parisi v. Davidson
scotus · 1972
green “the basic purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to allow an administrative agency to perform functions within its special competence - to make a factual record, to apply its expertise, and to correct its own errors so as to moot judicial controversies.” 12
5 United States v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
scotus · 1975
green “authorizes the sec to exercise a significant oversight function over the rules and activities of the registered associations.” 3
6 First Jersey Securities, Inc. v. Bergen
ca1 · 1979
green “comprehensiveness of the review procedure suggests that the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies should be applied to prevent circumvention of established procedures.” 3
7 Athlone Industries, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
cadc · 1983
green “it preserves the autonomy of the administrative agency by allowing the agency to apply its expertise and to exercise its discretion,” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check