6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown v. Family Dollar Stores of Indiana, LP.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown v. Family Dollar Stores of Indiana, LP Anchor | green | “an employee's own vague, inconsistent, or speculative testimony is insufficient to establish . . . a 'just and reasonable inference' as to how many overtime hours the employee worked.” | 4 |
| 2 | Turner v. the Saloon, Ltd. | green | “although the plaintiff disputed the accuracy of the employer's records, his mere assertions were insufficient to create a jury issue.” | 4 |
| 3 | Brian Weil v. Metal Technologies, Inc. | green | “provide evidence that they were actually working without compensation-not simply that they were clocked in for over 40 hours.” | 4 |
| 4 | Brand v. Comcast Corp. & Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC | green | “although the plaintiff disputed the accuracy of the employer's records, his mere assertions were insufficient to create a jury issue.” | 4 |
| 5 | Brand v. Comcast Corp. & Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC | green | “bare allegations and vague undocumented estimates' are insufficient to survive summary judgment.” | 4 |
| 6 | Brand v. Comcast Corp. & Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC | green | “there ain't really no memory involved” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.