6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Rollins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Rollins Anchor | green | “approaches the line dividing lay opinion testimony from expert opinion testimony,” | 6 |
| 2 | Kousisis v. United States | green | “use a material misstatement to trick a victim into a contract that requires handing over her money or property.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Michael Coscia | green | “in three particular circumstances: (1) based on the passage of time ...; (2) the partial filling of the large orders; or (3) complete filling of the small orders” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Michael Coscia | green | “knowingly entered bids or offers with the present intent to cancel the bid or offer prior to execution” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Ryan Randall Gilbertson | green | “gravamen of manipu- lation is deception of investors into believing that prices at which they purchase and sell securities are determined by the natural interplay of supply and demand, not rigged by ma- nipulators” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Anycco Rivers | green | “legal questions wrapped up in chal- lenges to the sufficiency of the evidence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.