7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mugno v. Mugno.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mugno v. Mugno Anchor | green | “a single distributional factor may support an unequal division.” | 5 |
| 2 | Alexander v. Alexander | green | “market value, if any, less the amount of any encumbrance serving to offset or reduce market value.” | 4 |
| 3 | Britt v. Britt | green | “potential changes in the value of marital or divisible property between the hearing and entry of the equitable distribution order to warrant additional consideration by the trial court.” | 3 |
| 4 | Troutman v. Troutman | green | “accordingly, this court will not reverse a trial court's findings of fact on appeal as long as they are supported by competent evidence.” | 3 |
| 5 | Mrozek v. Mrozek | green | “findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by any competent evidence from the record.” | 3 |
| 6 | Hill v. Sanderson | green | “at the time anthony left the home the cougar was valued at 4000 in the blue kelley book, and the lincoln was valued at 2000.” | 3 |
| 7 | Hill v. Sanderson | green | “within the range of the plaintiff's and defendant's valuations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.