6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lyons v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lyons v. United States Anchor | green | “on appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, we review the legal conclusions of the trial court de novo and defer to its findings of fact.” | 4 |
| 2 | Mustafa v. State | green | “evidence intercepted pursuant to more lenient statutory enactments of other jurisdictions must comply with maryland's more restrictive standards before it may be lawfully disclosed in a maryland court.” | 4 |
| 3 | Mustafa v. State | green | “maryland may not ordinarily proscribe conduct occurring outside its boundaries," but could” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Edmond | green | “the local law of the forum determines the admissibility of evidence ....” | 4 |
| 5 | Clark Construction Group, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and John Chavis | green | “the primary and general rule of statutory' construction is that the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the language that he or she used.” | 4 |
| 6 | W.H. v. D.W. | green | “interpreting a statute or a regulation is a holistic endeavor,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.