3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from DiTrolio v. Antiles.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiTrolio v. Antiles Anchor | green | “(1) the need for complete and final disposition through the avoidance of piecemeal decisions; (2) fairness to parties to the action and those with a material interest in the action; and (3) efficiency and the avoidance of waste and the reduction of delay.” | 12 |
| 2 | Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company Inc | green | “an extremely robust claim preclusion device that requires adversaries to join all possible claims stemming from an event or series of events in one suit.” | 9 |
| 3 | Higgins v. Thurber | green | “encompasses not only matters actually litigated but also other aspects of a controversy that might have been litigated and thereby decided in an earlier action.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.