5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 166 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Herring v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herring v. United States Anchor | green | “to trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it, and sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system.” | 86 |
| 2 | Herring v. United States | green | “the exclusionary rule serves to deter deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct, or in some circumstances recurring or systemic negligence.” | 27 |
| 3 | Davis v. United States | green | “for exclusion to be appropriate, the deterrence benefits of suppression must outweigh its heavy costs.” | 23 |
| 4 | Herring v. United States | green | “sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it, and sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system.” | 21 |
| 5 | United States v. Christopher Paul Cusumano, United States of America v. Robert William Porco | green | “in our review, we may disregard allegedly tainted material in the affidavit and ask whether sufficient facts remain to establish probable cause.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.