4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Mayor of Baltimore.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Mayor of Baltimore Anchor | green | “whether there was substantial evidence before the administrative agency on the record as a whole to support its conclusions.” | 8 |
| 2 | Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Riverview Nursing Centre, Inc. | green | “to the extent the issues on appeal turn on the correctness of an agency's findings of fact, such findings must be reviewed under the substantial evidence test.” | 6 |
| 3 | Comptroller of Treasury v. World Book Childcraft International, Inc. | green | “whether, ... a reasoning mind could reasonably have reached the conclusion reached by the agency, consistent with a proper application of the controlling legal principles.” | 5 |
| 4 | State Administration Board of Election Laws v. Billhimer | green | “restrained and disciplined judicial judgment so as not to interfere with the agency's factual conclusions.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.