Topic: when a person has obtained money to which he is not entitle… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #16875

6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smithberg v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Smithberg v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Anchor
ill · 2000
green “when a person has obtained money to which he is not entitled, under such circumstances that in equity and good conscience he ought not retain it, a constructive trust can be imposed to avoid unjust enrichment.” 9
2 People v. N L Industries
ill · 1992
green “skilling's description of the analysis in people v. nl industries, 152 ill. 2d 82, 96-98 (1992), is truncated and does not represent the full measure of this court's jurisprudence in ascertaining legislative intent to vest exclusive jurisdiction in an administrative agency.” 3
3 National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. DiMucci
illappct · 2015
green “does not require fault or illegality on the part of the defendant; the essence of the cause of action is that one party is enriched and it would be unjust for that party to retain the enrichment.” 3
4 J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Wild, Inc.
ill · 2016
green “did not have authority to correct any errors under section 2505-475 of the department of revenue law (20 ilcs 2505/2505-475 (west 2016)).” 3
5 J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Wild, Inc.
ill · 2016
green “nl industries considered the relevant statute as a whole, and the court referenced not only the lack of exclusionary language but also other statutory provisions that specifically referred to the circuit courts' ability to adjudicate the questions at issue.” 3
6 J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Wild, Inc.
ill · 2016
green “represent the full measure of this court's jurisprudence in ascertaining legislative intent to vest exclusive jurisdiction in an administrative agency.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check