3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matal v. Tam.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matal v. Tam Anchor | green | “giving offense is a viewpoint.” | 10 |
| 2 | Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky | green | “sensible basis for distinguishing what may come in from what must stay out.” | 9 |
| 3 | Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky | green | “guided by objective, workable standards.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.