8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Todd v. Godek.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Todd v. Godek Anchor | green | “there can be more than one proximate cause of an accident' . . . , and the issue of comparative negligence is generally a question for the jury to decide” | 3 |
| 2 | Joannis v. Cahill | green | “lawfully using the intersection” | 3 |
| 3 | Saved v. Aviles | green | “subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle” | 3 |
| 4 | Cupp v. McGaffick | green | “it is well settled that 'drivers have a duty to see what should be seen and to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances to avoid an accident,” | 3 |
| 5 | Cupp v. McGaffick | green | “see what should be seen and to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances to avoid an accident” | 3 |
| 6 | Costanzo v. County of Chautauqua | green | “lacks an adequate factual foundation and is of no probative value” | 3 |
| 7 | Espiritu v. Shuttle Express Coach, Inc. | green | “failed to see what was there to be seen through the proper use of his senses” | 3 |
| 8 | Morris v. Lenox Hill Hospital | green | “requires the resolution of factual inferences in favor of defendants, which is improper on a motion for summary judgment” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.