7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. Anchor | green | “no more burdensome to the defendant than necessary to provide complete relief to the plaintiffs before the court.” | 5 |
| 2 | Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. | green | “when a reviewing court determines that agency regulations are unlawful, the ordinary result is that the rules are vacated-not that their application to the individual petitioners is proscribed.” | 4 |
| 3 | E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump | green | “expended significant resources to send staff to the border as it attempts to shift its programs.” | 3 |
| 4 | E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump | green | “identified a 'rational connection between the facts found and the choice made' to promulgate the interim rule on an emergency basis.” | 3 |
| 5 | E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump | green | “it would be hard to imagine a more direct conflict” | 3 |
| 6 | Association of Public Agency Customers v. Bonneville Power Administration | green | “a petitioner's 'legally protected interest' need not be a statutorily created interest,” | 3 |
| 7 | Lair v. Bullock | green | “a motions panel's published opinion binds future panels the same as does a merits panel's published opinion,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.