4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC Anchor | green | “if not, the claims pass muster under 101.” | 8 |
| 2 | Angie Waller v. City of Fort Worth Texas, e | green | “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 7 |
| 3 | O'Reilly v. Morse | green | “a patent is not good for an effect, or the result of a certain process because such patents would prohibit all other persons from making the same thing by any means whatsoever.” | 4 |
| 4 | Angie Waller v. City of Fort Worth Texas, e | green | “ask whether the remaining allegations are sufficient to nudge the plaintiff's claim across the plausibility threshold.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.