3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jennings v. City of Stillwater.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jennings v. City of Stillwater Anchor | green | “inevitably, the degree to which others are viewed as similarly situated depends substantially on the facts and context of the case.” | 12 |
| 2 | Ruston v. Town Bd. for Town of Skaneateles | green | “the court must determine whether, based on a plaintiff's allegations in the complaint, it is plausible that a jury could ultimately determine that the comparators are similarly situated.” | 6 |
| 3 | Lindquist v. City of Pasadena Texas | green | “question of 'whether parties are similarly situated is generally a fact-intensive inquiry' that depends heavily on the particular context of the case at hand.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.